================
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static_assert(__is_trivially_destructible(S3));
static_assert(!__is_trivially_copyable(S3));
static_assert(!__is_trivially_relocatable(S3)); //
expected-warning{{deprecated}}
//FIXME
-static_assert(__builtin_is_cpp_trivially_relocatable(S3));
+static_assert(!__builtin_is_cpp_trivially_relocatable(S3));
----------------
rjmccall wrote:
I see. The idea is that it should work, and while we don't support it today, we
do intend to in the future? That seems reasonable.
Wait, trivial relocation of a polymorphic object just copies the v-table
pointers? That seems obviously incorrect unless there's some semantic reason
relocation can only happen on complete objects.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154490
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
