================
@@ -1,8 +1,19 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 -fsyntax-only -verify 
-std=gnu++11 -fblocks -Wno-deprecated-builtins -Wno-defaulted-function-deleted 
-Wno-c++17-extensions  %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 -fsyntax-only -verify 
-std=gnu++14 -fblocks -Wno-deprecated-builtins -Wno-defaulted-function-deleted 
-Wno-c++17-extensions  %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 -fsyntax-only -verify 
-std=gnu++17 -fblocks -Wno-deprecated-builtins -Wno-defaulted-function-deleted  
%s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 -fsyntax-only -verify 
-std=gnu++20 -fblocks -Wno-deprecated-builtins -Wno-defaulted-function-deleted  
%s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 -fsyntax-only 
-verify=expected,expected-noncl -std=gnu++11 -fblocks -Wno-deprecated-builtins 
-Wno-defaulted-function-deleted -Wno-c++17-extensions  %s
----------------
svenvh wrote:

I'm a bit hesitant about the large number of `#if`s added to this test; a 
sporadic guard would be fine I suppose, but with this many guards we'd need an 
opinion from the C++ maintainers.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/153508
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to