================
@@ -909,3 +909,46 @@ void foo33(__builtin_va_list a) {
// OGCG: %[[B_IMAG_PTR:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds nuw { float, float },
ptr %[[B_ADDR]], i32 0, i32 1
// OGCG: store float %[[RESULT_REAL]], ptr %[[B_REAL_PTR]], align 4
// OGCG: store float %[[RESULT_IMAG]], ptr %[[B_IMAG_PTR]], align 4
+
+void foo34(float _Complex a) {}
+
+// CIR: %[[A_ADDR:.*]] = cir.alloca !cir.complex<!cir.float>,
!cir.ptr<!cir.complex<!cir.float>>, ["a", init]
+// CIR: cir.store %{{.*}}, %[[A_ADDR]] : !cir.complex<!cir.float>,
!cir.ptr<!cir.complex<!cir.float>>
+
+// LLVM: %[[A_ADDR:.*]] = alloca { float, float }, i64 1, align 4
+// LLVM: store { float, float } %{{.*}}, ptr %[[A_ADDR]], align 4
----------------
bcardosolopes wrote:
Seems different from OG, probably ABI related since we don't have call conv
lowering yet? Wonder how we should document this
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/156236
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
