rjmccall wrote: Having library code that describes the layout of an RTTI object seems reasonable enough. I don't have strong opinions about whether that should go in AST or a new library.
I'm not sure I understand why ClangIR actually needs to lower RTTI objects, however. This seems like exactly the sort of thing that should not, in fact, be lowered in a high-level IR. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157936 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
