Prazek added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33470#764846, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> Once you fix the typo in the check, can you run it over some large C++ code > bases to see if it finds any results? I tried it on LLVM code base (after fixing bug with the numeric_limits name) and it didn't find anything suspisious. Unfortunatelly I don't have enough time to try it on different codebases, but I am weiling to fix any bug with this check if it would happen in the future. The release 5.0 is near, so I would like to push it upstream. Does it sound good to you? https://reviews.llvm.org/D33470 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
