vbvictor wrote:

> > so I vote for keeping this check disable to avoid unnecessary churn
> 
> I agree! It might however be worth briefly documenting why we want to keep 
> this check disabled, so we don't accidentally have the same discussion again 
> in the future.

I'd convert `.clang-tidy` to YAML syntax (which naturally support comments) and 
write comments with links there.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/158774
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to