================
@@ -96,3 +96,19 @@ void test_snprintf6() {
char b[4] = {0};
snprintf(a, sizeof(a), "%s", b); // no-warning
}
+
+
+void memcpy(int dst, int src, size_t size); // expected-warning{{incompatible
redeclaration of library function 'memcpy'}} expected-note{{'memcpy' is a
builtin with type 'void *(void *, const void *, __size_t)' (aka 'void *(void *,
const void *, unsigned long)')}}
----------------
NagyDonat wrote:
The static analyzer tests usually add `-Wno-...` to the `RUN:` lines in order
to silence the compiler warnings that overlap with the tested feature. I think
that would be slightly more elegant here than these long `expected` lines.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160511
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
