github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp --
clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/ThrowKeywordMissingCheck.cpp
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/bugprone/throw-keyword-missing.cpp
``````````
:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/ThrowKeywordMissingCheck.cpp
b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/ThrowKeywordMissingCheck.cpp
index cd41e0cc7..cafb4a3e5 100644
--- a/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/ThrowKeywordMissingCheck.cpp
+++ b/clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/ThrowKeywordMissingCheck.cpp
@@ -17,11 +17,10 @@ namespace clang::tidy::bugprone {
void ThrowKeywordMissingCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) {
Finder->addMatcher(
cxxConstructExpr(
- hasType(cxxRecordDecl(
- anyOf(matchesName("[Ee]xception|EXCEPTION"),
- hasAnyBase(hasType(hasCanonicalType(
- recordType(hasDeclaration(cxxRecordDecl(
- matchesName("[Ee]xception|EXCEPTION")))))))))),
+ hasType(cxxRecordDecl(anyOf(
+ matchesName("[Ee]xception|EXCEPTION"),
+ hasAnyBase(hasType(hasCanonicalType(recordType(hasDeclaration(
+ cxxRecordDecl(matchesName("[Ee]xception|EXCEPTION")))))))))),
unless(anyOf(
hasAncestor(
stmt(anyOf(cxxThrowExpr(), callExpr(), returnStmt()))),
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160725
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
