hubert-reinterpretcast wrote: > > Why is that hard to believe? > > Because there's no need to mix a completely new directive with fundamentally > different instructions (and parsing) on the same line. All the complexity > required to support this (much less the mental stumbling blocks for readers > of the code) stand in contrast to the trivial alternative of "add a newline". > The putative burden of doing so doesn't even come close to justifying the > resulting complexity -- it's entirely self-defeating of the standard to allow > this IMO.
I believe I have explained why this was not standardized as a "new directive" from a design viewpoint. The directives were more a means to an end. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107168 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
