trcrsired wrote: > This is going badly off-topic. > > Supporting `--sysroot` with plain Clang is alright and good. Supporting > libc++ is also good. > > But both need to automatically find a **normally-installed** MSVC SDK without > a GNU-like refactor, and yes, that includes things like `Program Files(x86)`. > So in other words it needs to work similar to how `/winsysroot` currently > does. > > Ideally the argument should simply change the priority of the sysroot lookup > (which is what `/winsysroot` does anyway) instead of imposing a full > GNU-style filesystem reorganisation. To address @Andarwinux's and > @YexuanXiao's concerns it could also directly invoke the linker through the > driver while simultaneously forwarding the sysroot information. > > Then we can special-case `-stdlib=libc++` to internally set up the include > and library paths to firstly sysroot if provided and then falling back to > Clang's own libc++, instead of having the user do it manually [as linked > above](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53004#issuecomment-1207167610). > Since libc++ is distributed in GNU-style layout, this needs to use the > resource directory to find the correct path for the headers and libraries. > > This is exactly what @zmodem [first > asked](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96417?notification_referrer_id=NT_kwDOADlIYLMxMTIwODI4MjkyMTozNzU0MDgw#issuecomment-2200709561), > and I concur.
i think a better solution would be making winsysroot to have different semantics with sysroot so that user and build can choose whatever they need https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96417 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
