================
@@ -277,6 +307,23 @@ __kmpc_parallel_51(IdentTy *ident, int32_t, int32_t
if_expr,
__kmpc_end_sharing_variables();
}
+[[clang::always_inline]] void
+__kmpc_parallel_51(IdentTy *ident, int32_t id, int32_t if_expr,
+ int32_t num_threads, int proc_bind, void *fn,
+ void *wrapper_fn, void **args, int64_t nargs) {
+ return __kmpc_parallel_impl(ident, id, if_expr, num_threads, proc_bind, fn,
+ wrapper_fn, args, nargs);
+}
+
+[[clang::always_inline]] void
+__kmpc_parallel_60(IdentTy *ident, int32_t id, int32_t if_expr,
----------------
kevinsala wrote:
I see, seems that OpenMPOPT handles `__kmpc_parallel_51` but not
`__kmpc_parallel_60`. The only difference is the strict modifier. Do you think
it's ok to still use `__kmpc_parallel_51` and use the last parameter
`nt_strict` with default value `false`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163565
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
