compnerd wrote:

> > I don't think we should condone anything that assumes fetching WinSDK/MSVC 
> > derived files from a third party provider or github repo or anything like 
> > that.
> 
> I agree, but can we condone, or even redistribute, a script that 
> post-processes the files this way, so anyone can replicate this setup for 
> their personal use?
> 
> Looking at the linked github repo (which as you say may be violating a 
> license), it really makes me question the entire Unix /usr/(include|lib) 
> design philosophy, of having one single, global header and library search 
> directory. But, that is what people do in practice. :)
> 
> > Perhaps one thing we could do is maybe relax that assumption, and see if we 
> > can shift some of the burden from users to the driver by having some form 
> > of case-insensitive lookup when we are targeting `x86_64-pc-windows-msvc`?
> 
> I recall @compnerd asked for this at some point in the past, but perhaps he's 
> just adopted the `ciopfs` mount solution. Anyway, [my search didn't find an 
> existing 
> issue](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20case%20insensitive),
>  so I'll file a new one for that. ... Filed as issue #161400 .

I ended up pursing a hybrid approach. I ended up with modifications to the 
compiler to support that partially since it was needed for the (clang) modules 
support. However, I also used a forest of symlinks to get as much as possible 
done more easily. I haven't had to support that in a while and I think that at 
this point, my approach would be to use a VFS overlay rather than the symlinks. 
The linker would need the symlinks for the import libraries still though.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96417
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to