kuhar wrote: > > std::is_same<...>::type is the same as std::is_same<...>. > > This is technically not true. `is_same<T, U>::type` names a specialization of > `integral_constant`, not `is_same`.
I think the point is that it's the same for the purpose of SFINAE? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160237 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
