https://github.com/Sirraide commented:

I’m feeling somewhat conflicted about this approach: on the one hand it’s 
better than what we were doing before, but on the other rebuilding a bunch of 
types to circumvent our own analysis... a bit weird. I wonder if we could 
instead extract the parts of `IsFunctionConversion()` that we care about here 
into a separate function.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/160477
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to