zmodem wrote:

Here's another example TU. `perf stat -r5` shows a 27% regression here. 72616c5 
does not seem to make much difference.

```
clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -O0 -emit-obj -mrelocation-model 
pic -pic-level 2 -mconstructor-aliases -funwind-tables=2 -target-cpu x86-64 
-target-feature +sse3 -tune-cpu generic -debug-info-kind=constructor 
-dwarf-version=4 -debugger-tuning=gdb -ggnu-pubnames 
-gsimple-template-names=simple -mllvm -generate-arange-section 
-debug-forward-template-params  -std=c++20 -fdeprecated-macro 
-fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fwrapv -fwrapv-pointer 
-pthread -stack-protector 1 -ftrivial-auto-var-init=pattern -fno-rtti 
-fgnuc-version=4.2.1 -fno-implicit-modules -fskip-odr-check-in-gmf 
-fno-sized-deallocation -Qn -fuse-ctor-homing -fcomplete-member-pointers 
-faddrsig -x c++ /tmp/inspector_style_resolver.ii -w
```

[inspector_style_resolver.ii.gz](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23100228/inspector_style_resolver.ii.gz)


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/161671
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to