================
@@ -421,13 +421,7 @@ As an example, the module map file for the C standard
library might look a bit l
.. parsed-literal::
- module std [system] [extern_c] {
----------------
zygoloid wrote:
Hm.
It's definitely flawed in that it's viral and requires strong layering between
your C headers and your C++ headers, but if you have proper layering, if your C
library isn't including C++ headers, and if you can add the attribute to your C
library and its transitive dependencies, it can work well. Not everyone has a
setup where the C library includes C++ headers rather than being layered
entirely beneath the C++ library.
But you make a good point that it's got enough problems that making a blanket
recommendation to use it would be unreasonable. Yeah, I'm convinced we
shouldn't be using it in this example.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165057
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits