4ast wrote: > I think we come to a point where we need to decide if `gotox` is a part of > `cpuv4`. If it is, we should keep it disabled by default, to avoid backwards > compatibility issues. @4ast , @yonghong-song
it's fine for gotox to be in cpuv4. It will be generated only for large-ish switches where backward compat is unlikely to be an issue, and for explicit computed goto which would have failed to compile. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165456 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
