dstenb wrote: > Ping, does anyone have any thoughts on the endian-ness discussion? I think > other than that point all current review questions have been addressed
Sorry, I'd want to try this on a publicly available big-endian target with GDB trunk, but I have not gotten to that yet. I have not gotten any wiser to what the DWARF standard actually intends. I'd be fine with landing this without the endian-ness issue resolved. Perhaps you could add a note about in the commit message, and add TODOs about potentially emitting the `DW_AT_data_bit_offset` attribute for big-endian targets at the two points that the `DW_AT_bit_size` attribute is emitted? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164372 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
