vbvictor wrote: > It is hard to understand double negation in not-nothrow part. At least we > should avoid it. maybe bugprone-exception-copy-constructor-throwable WDYT?
Agree that double-negation is hard to read, changed to `bugprone-exception-copy-constructor-throws` (changed `throwable` to `throws` because it sounds like [an object](https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/lang/Throwable.html) to me) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164061 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
