================
@@ -2313,10 +2313,8 @@ StmtResult Parser::ParseBreakOrContinueStatement(bool
IsContinue) {
// TODO: Make this a compatibility/extension warning instead once the
// syntax of this feature is finalised.
Diag(LabelLoc, diag::err_c2y_labeled_break_continue) << IsContinue;
- if (!Target) {
+ if (!Target)
Diag(LabelLoc, diag::err_break_continue_label_not_found) << IsContinue;
- return StmtError();
----------------
Sirraide wrote:
I feel like the main issue here is the fact that we’re trying to
constant-evaluate a function that contains an error... which is a bit
questionable imo.
> we could break to the nearest loop as a way to recover, but that may end up
> generating confusing false positives with CFG-based diagnostics
I don’t believe CFG-based diagnostics run if there was an error (at least the
ones in the static analyser don’t)?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/168332
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
