daniel-levin wrote: Ah, indeed, the "regression" indeed enforces the presence of the bug!
Consider the [code](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/622f72f4bef8b177e1e4f318465260fbdb7711ef/clang/test/Driver/solaris-ld-sanitizer.c#L50) of the failing test: ``` /// Check i386-pc-solaris2.11, 64bit // RUN: %clang -m64 -fsanitize=undefined --target=i386-pc-solaris2.11 %s -### -fuse-ld= \ // RUN: --sysroot=%S/Inputs/solaris_x86_tree 2>&1 \ // RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-LD-X64-UBSAN %s // RUN: %clang -m64 -fsanitize=undefined --target=i386-pc-solaris2.11 %s -### -fuse-ld=gld \ // RUN: --sysroot=%S/Inputs/solaris_x86_tree 2>&1 \ // RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-GLD-X64-UBSAN %s // CHECK-LD-X64-UBSAN: "-z" "relax=transtls" // CHECK-GLD-X64-UBSAN-NOT: "-z" "relax=transtls" ``` It checks that `-z relax=transtls` is passed to the linker. This flag should only be passed to Solaris ld. If you build with CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER as `bfd` or `gld`, this test cannot possibly be correct. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/163000 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
