================
@@ -20,3 +20,17 @@ r (long long __complex__ a, long long __complex__ b)
{
return 0;
}
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} void @s(ptr dead_on_unwind noalias writable
sret(fp128) align 8 %agg.result, ptr noundef byval(fp128) align 8 %0) #0
+long double
+s(long double a)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} { fp128, fp128 } @t(ptr noundef byval({ fp128,
fp128 }) align 8 %a) #0
----------------
koachan wrote:
I changed it so that only long doubles get the inreg treatment, think the
others should be fine as-is.
> They don't trigger a failure because they use regex `.*`
Though, about the regex, I'm pretty sure that clang generates a lot of
attributes in that place, I wonder if I should just use them as-is in the tests?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/162226
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
