================
@@ -271,6 +224,104 @@ class FindUninitializedField {
};
} // namespace
+namespace llvm {
+template <> struct format_provider<FindUninitializedField::FieldChainTy> {
+ static void format(const FindUninitializedField::FieldChainTy &V,
+ raw_ostream &Stream, StringRef Style) {
+ if (V.size() == 1)
+ Stream << "(e.g., field: '" << *V[0] << "')";
+ else {
+ Stream << "(e.g., via the field chain: '";
+ bool First = true;
+ for (FindUninitializedField::FieldChainTy::const_iterator DI = V.begin(),
+ DE = V.end();
+ DI != DE; ++DI) {
+ if (First)
+ First = false;
+ else
+ Stream << '.';
+ Stream << **DI;
+ }
----------------
NagyDonat wrote:
One more last minute request: please replace this with a range-base for loop.
This PR moves this loop here from a different location, while on Sunday another
PR https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169175 was merged which refactored
this loop into a range-based for loop. It would be nice to preserve this minor
code quality improvement in this PR as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/164600
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
