================
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+// Check BC input
+// RUN: mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: touch %t/a.bc
+// RUN: touch %t/b.bc
+// RUN: %clang -### --target=spirv64 -emit-llvm %t/a.bc %t/b.bc 2>&1 |
FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-TOOL-BC %s
+
+// CHECK-TOOL-BC: "-cc1" {{.*}} "-o" "[[TMP1_BC:.+]]" "-x" "ir" "{{.*}}.bc"
+// CHECK-TOOL-BC: "-cc1" {{.*}} "-o" "[[TMP2_BC:.+]]" "-x" "ir" "{{.*}}.bc"
+// CHECK-TOOL-BC: llvm-link{{.*}} "-o" {{.*}} "[[TMP1_BC]]" "[[TMP2_BC]]"
+
+// RUN: %clang -ccc-print-bindings --target=spirv64 -emit-llvm %t/a.bc %t/b.bc
2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-BINDINGS-BC %s
+
+// CHECK-BINDINGS-BC: "spirv64" - "clang", inputs: ["{{.*}}.bc"], output:
"[[TMP1_BINDINGS_BC:.+]]"
+// CHECK-BINDINGS-BC: "spirv64" - "clang", inputs: ["{{.*}}.bc"], output:
"[[TMP2_BINDINGS_BC:.+]]"
+// CHECK-BINDINGS-BC: "spirv64" - "SPIR-V::Linker", inputs:
["[[TMP1_BINDINGS_BC]]", "[[TMP2_BINDINGS_BC]]"], output: "{{.*}}.bc"
+
+// Check source input
+// RUN: touch %t/foo.c
+// RUN: touch %t/bar.c
+
+// RUN: %clang -### --target=spirv64 -emit-llvm %t/foo.c %t/bar.c 2>&1 |
FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-TOOL-SRC %s
+
+// CHECK-TOOL-SRC: "-cc1" {{.*}} "-o" "[[TMP1_SRC_BC:.+]]" "-x" "c"
"{{.*}}foo.c"
+// CHECK-TOOL-SRC: "-cc1" {{.*}} "-o" "[[TMP2_SRC_BC:.+]]" "-x" "c"
"{{.*}}bar.c"
+// CHECK-TOOL-SRC: llvm-link{{.*}} "-o" {{.*}} "[[TMP1_SRC_BC]]"
"[[TMP2_SRC_BC]]"
----------------
shiltian wrote:
Not sure if that's a good idea to call `llvm-link` directly. Can't we just call
`clang`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169572
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
