BStott6 wrote: > I appreciate the effort you've put into this @BStott6; are you using > `atomic_thread_fence` in a way that gives false positives? Perhaps I can try > to add support for them in TSan (it looks like someone has a workaround here > for now: https://stackoverflow.com/a/70543751)
[This](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52942) issue documents false positives when using `atomic_thread_fence`. Supporting it in TSan would be the best solution, then this PR can be closed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166542 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
