DanBlackwell wrote: > > I appreciate the effort you've put into this @BStott6; are you using > > `atomic_thread_fence` in a way that gives false positives? Perhaps I can > > try to add support for them in TSan (it looks like someone has a workaround > > here for now: https://stackoverflow.com/a/70543751) > > [This](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52942) issue documents > false positives when using `atomic_thread_fence`. Support in TSan would be > the best solution; if it's implemented, we can remove the warning.
The more I think about it, the more I see why `atomic_thread_fence` would be very tricky for TSan to work with. I do think this PR is valuable, as we can at least warn the user that they are likely to encounter false positives. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166542 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
