boomanaiden154 wrote: > Just sloppy wording, sorry. Virtual bases are always live out of the base > subobject destructor.
Ack. > I know there's been feedback before from Google folks about having a flag > whenever we expand an optimization so that they can more easily check whether > the expansion specifically caused a particular regression. I'm the person at Google currently driving this. I think we should be fine with a single flag and would probably push back against the introduction of a second flag if we agree to postpone the enablement of adding the attribute for classes with a non-zero number of bases. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166276 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
