Hendrik =?utf-8?q?Hübner?Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/[email protected]>
================
@@ -447,6 +447,68 @@ def CIR_ConstPtrAttr : CIR_Attr<"ConstPtr", "ptr",
[TypedAttrInterface]> {
}];
}
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+// CmpThreeWayInfoAttr
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+def CIR_CmpOrdering : CIR_I32EnumAttr<
+ "CmpOrdering", "three-way comparison ordering kind", [
+ I32EnumAttrCase<"Strong", 0, "strong">,
+ I32EnumAttrCase<"Partial", 1, "partial">
+]> {
+ let genSpecializedAttr = 0;
+}
+
+def CIR_CmpThreeWayInfoAttr : CIR_Attr<"CmpThreeWayInfo", "cmp3way_info"> {
----------------
andykaylor wrote:
My understanding is that the standard library is free to use whatever values it
likes within certain constraints. For example, it appears that libstdc++
defines `partial_ordering::unordered` as `-128` while libc++ defines it as
`-127`.
https://godbolt.org/z/Ga6d6senM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169963
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
