szepet added a comment.

In https://reviews.llvm.org/D34260#819721, @NoQ wrote:

> ...  and add the extra run-line that'd show you the backtrace. We made 
> changes, so the issue might have been wiped out accidentally (or maybe you're 
> actually right!), and if it wasn't, at least we'd have the backtrace for the 
> crash.


Hmm I removed the statistics checks so I guess it should print the stacktrace 
in case of a crash anyway. Am I right? (The whole point of the statistics check 
was to count the number of loops unrolled but  
'clang_analyzer_numTimesReached();' is much more powerful.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D34260



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to