================
@@ -3637,3 +3637,28 @@ void tools::setComplexRange(const Driver &D, StringRef
NewOpt,
LastOpt = NewOpt;
Range = NewRange;
}
+
+void tools::constructLlvmLinkCommand(Compilation &C, const Tool &T,
+ const JobAction &JA,
+ const InputInfoList &JobInputs,
+ const ArgStringList &LinkerInputs,
+ const InputInfo &Output,
+ const llvm::opt::ArgList &Args,
+ const char *OutputFilename) {
+ // Construct llvm-link command.
+ // The output from llvm-link is a bitcode file.
+
+ assert(!LinkerInputs.empty() && !JobInputs.empty() &&
+ "Must have at least one input.");
+
+ ArgStringList LlvmLinkArgs(
----------------
mgcarrasco wrote:
Thanks for the answer. I think it could be worth adding a comment like this:
> this function expects that the inputs to llvm-link will be specified by the
> caller, but the output is handled by this function.
Also, would the function work if `LinkerInputs.empty()` but
`!JobInputs.empty()`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/169572
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
