razvanlupusoru wrote:

> SO, in order to implement this, I've decided that the 'called as' (bound) 
> function must have the same signature as the one marked by the 'routine'. 
> This is trivially sensible in non-member functions, however requires a bit 
> more thought for member(and thus lambda-call-operators) functions. In this 
> case, we 'promote' the type of the function to a 'free' function by turning 
> the implicit 'this' to an explicit 'this'.

This seems sensible to me and glad you found a reasonable way to do this.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/171749
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to