================
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+; RUN: %llc_dwarf -O0 -filetype=obj < %s | llvm-dwarfdump -debug-info - |
FileCheck --implicit-check-not "{{DW_TAG|NULL}}" %s
+; REQUIRES: object-emission
+
+; inline __attribute__((always_inline))
+; int removed() { struct A {int i;}; struct A a; return a.i++; }
+;
+; __attribute__((always_inline))
+; int not_removed() { struct B {int i;}; struct B b; return b.i++; }
+;
+; int foo() { return removed() + not_removed(); }}
+
+; Ensure that function-local types have the correct subprogram parent even if
+; those subprograms are inlined.
----------------
jmorse wrote:
Could we specify which is the correct subprogram parent for future readers; the
abstract subprogram, right?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/165032
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
