github-actions[bot] wrote:
<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>
``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions c,cpp --
clang/test/Sema/typeof-asm-noreturn.c clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
--diff_from_common_commit
``````````
:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:
</details>
<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
index 0941e2e4a..f0c2f4378 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
@@ -9542,9 +9542,8 @@ static FunctionDecl *CreateNewFunctionDecl(Sema &SemaRef,
Declarator &D,
bool HasPrototype =
(D.isFunctionDeclarator() && D.getFunctionTypeInfo().hasPrototype) ||
(D.getDeclSpec().isTypeRep() &&
- HasFunctionPrototype(
- SemaRef.GetTypeFromParser(D.getDeclSpec().getRepAsType(),
- nullptr))) ||
+ HasFunctionPrototype(SemaRef.GetTypeFromParser(
+ D.getDeclSpec().getRepAsType(), nullptr))) ||
HasFunctionPrototype(R);
assert(
(HasPrototype || !SemaRef.getLangOpts().requiresStrictPrototypes()) &&
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/174092
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
