ChuanqiXu9 wrote: > > I'd like to land this in two weeks if no objections come in. > > Clang 22 branches in a few days, and this should not land before that IMO. > Especially given that there was no discussion (that I'm aware of) about > breaking the previously valid AST invariant following: > > > Maybe it's time to change that, given that modules is now a standard > > language feature. But I think this is probably something the Clang Area > > Team should consider and make a conscious decision on.
Fair. Sent https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-clang-not-assuming-there-is-at-most-one-definition-in-a-redeclaration-chain/89360 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/172430 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
