shiltian wrote: > I don't think checking out LLVM is unreasonable, we already do this for > libc++ runtimes and I haven't heard of anyone deeming this as a blocker.
The key difference is, `libc++` is a LLVM project since day 1, but `libomp` is not. > There is no difference passing arguments at the top level here. You're > confusing this with passing arguments to the main LLVM invocation which then > needs to pass them to the runtimes build. You're doing the second part > yourself here so it's the same interface. So basically everything like CMake's own arguments and `libomp` specific arguments can pass directly? That's good to know. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/152189 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
