================
@@ -8,3 +8,28 @@ template <int Unroll> void foo() {
#pragma GCC unroll Unroll
for (int i = 0; i < Unroll; ++i);
}
+
+struct val {
+ constexpr operator int() const { return 1; }
+};
+
+// generic lambda (using double template instantiation)
+
+template<typename T>
+void use(T t) {
+ auto lam = [](auto N) {
----------------
brunodf-snps wrote:
I've still added a code comment (see commit e7efc38d) to explain that the guard
against a value dependent expression _after_ template instantiation is
presently needed, but could in the future become unnecessary (i.e. your remark
"ONE day we will fix that").
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/172289
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
