localspook wrote:

> And If you instantiate the function, it works with the template.

This PR breaks that case, true. But I hope we can agree that the current 
behaviour is still not ideal, right? We would like the check to work whether 
you instantiate the template or not. That would require another PR implementing 
heuristic name resolution. Do you think that should be done before this PR gets 
merged?


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/175121
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to