vabridgers wrote: I ran this check on an LLVM build (all files). Good news is no crashes, but there are many false positives (as one might expect in it's current state). I'll start extracting the false findings into the LIT and see if can address those. The check is also finding some true findings and bringing up questions about what should really be diagnosed or filtered. I'll extract those and start posting the questions. The checker is too noisy in it's current state to be useful.
I don't suppose there'd be an objection to trying to address the false issues? It may take some time, but I think it's worth trying. Perhaps others want to see this move to some MVP first for good reason, then see incremental improvement. I'm easy on this question :) Thanks all https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/175429 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
