eoan-ermine wrote: > In these particular case(s), we should use INTXX_MAX instead.
@hax0kartik Could you please explain why we should use INTXX_MAX and not just skip the negation part for this case like in [clang::Interp::Integral::neg](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/ec399ef172338e42642c8fe894dc753a2a34b98d/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Integral.h#L265)? Thank you in advance! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/176390 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
