erichkeane wrote: To me, this seems like a pretty error-prone heuristic, and I question the value because of that of that here? But yeah, clangd devs should comment, I would love to hear their thoughts.
> I think the most common extensionless path component in a directory named > `include` will be another directory name. e.g., `include/bits/blah.h`. Note as long as the `-I` went to the `include`, it would still find the thing in `bits` (though with `blah` not being extensionless, I think this doesn't matter). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/166447 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
