cyndyishida wrote: >this fix is rather urgent, so I think not breaking any existing tests is >sufficient.
I don't agree. The last resolution for classes of this problem also landed without a test, and we saw it reappear. I'm not saying we need a regression test here to prove correctness, but there needs to be some way to provide confidence that this fixes the bug observed. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/177062 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
