Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= <[email protected]>,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= <[email protected]>,
Nathan =?utf-8?q?Gauër?= <[email protected]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/[email protected]>
================
@@ -4537,6 +4540,9 @@ static llvm::Value *emitArraySubscriptGEP(CodeGenFunction
&CGF,
bool signedIndices,
SourceLocation loc,
const llvm::Twine &name = "arrayidx") {
+ if (CGF.getLangOpts().HLSL && inbounds &&
CGF.getLangOpts().EmitStructuredGEP)
+ return CGF.Builder.CreateStructuredGEP(elemType, ptr, indices);
----------------
s-perron wrote:
I'm wondering how the `inbounds` and `EmitStructruedGEP` should interact. Is
the plan to eventually make it an assert. If you want structuredGEPs then all
accesses must be inbounds? Or will we allow clang to generate a mix of
instructions?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/177332
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
