=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <[email protected]>, =?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?= <[email protected]> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/[email protected]>
================ @@ -28,7 +28,9 @@ Functions declared explicitly with ``noexcept(false)`` or ``throw(exception)`` will be excluded from the analysis, as even though it is not recommended for functions like ``swap()``, ``main()``, move constructors, move assignment operators and destructors, it is a clear indication of the developer's -intention and should be respected. +intention and should be respected. To still check for this situation, the check ---------------- EugeneZelenko wrote: Is it possible to rephrase `To still check`? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/176430 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
