ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
> * But the results for Clang appear to be correct and there is the expected > number of cache hits from source files. It appears that Clang doesn't include > macro definitions in the PCH? At least in my tests, the PCH ended up being > identical (same hash sum)? (@ChuanqiXu9 @Bigcheese is this correct?) I think clang include the macro definition in the PCH. You can verify this by inserting outputs to ASTWriter::WritePreprocessor https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/176420 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
