artagnon wrote: > What is the advantage of making this change?
It would simplify application code, which checks "zvknha or zvknhb" when zvknha is needed. Besides, zvkng would include zvknha, which I think is intended. > zvknha and zvknhb are mutually exclusive [riscv/riscv-crypto#364 > (comment)](https://github.com/riscv/riscv-crypto/issues/364#issuecomment-1726782096) I don't understand the comment: the table is quite clear? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178680 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
