fogsong233 wrote: > I think we should move towards tentative parsing as my comment under the > previous PR suggests. I still think that the `SuppressAccessChecks` approach > is not correct. We should teach the relevant tentative parsing logic to > understand that we are defining an out of line constructor and tell us that's > not a statement.
Okay. I will check the logic of `ParseDeclarationOrFunctionDefinition`. Another question is, can we use it directly tentatively? If it runs okay, it means we found a decl, that is good. Otherwise, this is a stml, then we run `parseTopLevelStml`. Is it okay? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178842 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
