llvmbot wrote:

<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang

Author: Timm Baeder (tbaederr)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

There are situations where DiscardResult is set, but we still wish to emit a 
float value, e.g. when we will discard the result of an operation involving 
such a float value.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179644.diff


2 Files Affected:

- (modified) clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp (-2) 
- (modified) clang/test/AST/ByteCode/complex.cpp (+6-1) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp 
b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp
index af076f90733df..43b4af4e4f33a 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ByteCode/Compiler.cpp
@@ -7580,8 +7580,6 @@ bool Compiler<Emitter>::emitDummyPtr(const DeclTy &D, 
const Expr *E) {
 
 template <class Emitter>
 bool Compiler<Emitter>::emitFloat(const APFloat &F, const Expr *E) {
-  assert(!DiscardResult && "Should've been checked before");
-
   if (Floating::singleWord(F.getSemantics()))
     return this->emitConstFloat(Floating(F), E);
 
diff --git a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/complex.cpp 
b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/complex.cpp
index 9bf000d65466c..68a8e78d5b25b 100644
--- a/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/complex.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/AST/ByteCode/complex.cpp
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 // RUN: %clang_cc1 -fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter 
-verify=both,expected -Wno-unused-value %s
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -verify=both,ref -Wno-unused-value %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1                                         -verify=both,ref    
  -Wno-unused-value %s
 
 constexpr _Complex double z1 = {1.0, 2.0};
 static_assert(__real(z1) == 1.0, "");
@@ -131,6 +131,11 @@ static_assert(ignored() == 0, "");
 static_assert((int)I1 == 1, "");
 static_assert((float)D == 1.0f, "");
 
+
+void ignoredEmitFloat() {
+  (1.f / (2.f + 3i), 4.f);
+}
+
 static_assert(__real((_Complex unsigned)5) == 5);
 static_assert(__imag((_Complex unsigned)5) == 0);
 

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179644
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to