================ @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c90 -pedantic -Wno-comment -Wno-deprecated-non-prototype -Wimplicit-int -verify=c90 -x c %s +// RUN: cp %s %t +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c90 -pedantic -Wno-comment -Wno-deprecated-non-prototype -Wimplicit-int -fixit %t +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c90 -pedantic -Wno-comment -Wno-deprecated-non-prototype -Wimplicit-int -Werror -x c %t +// RUN: cat %t | FileCheck %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c99 -pedantic -Wno-deprecated-non-prototype -verify=c99 -x c %s ---------------- Sirraide wrote:
```suggestion // // RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c99 -pedantic -Wno-deprecated-non-prototype -verify=c99 -x c %s ``` nit: I feel like adding an empty line makes it a bit easier to figure out that we’re running the same commands once for C90 and once for C99 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179356 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
