rnk wrote: > Perhaps it would be better to do this in two seperate patches, so that Git > identifies this as a renaming and doesn’t lose history?
Sure. I updated the PR with two git commits, but I think I will manually push them together (I believe we still have the ability to do that, with warnings) so that we don't have a window of broken / misformatted documentation. I confirmed the blame works locally, it goes back to the old code owners file now. > Have you verified this actually builds the correct documentation? Yes, I built the `docs-clang-html` target and verified that the output is *almost* identical. It has one extra heading: <img width="2049" height="1289" alt="Screenshot 2026-02-10 at 9 14 44 AM" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8f43ec75-cac9-41df-bd7d-d80efddce319"; /> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/180652 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
