teresajohnson wrote: > That sounds like a reasonable idea. A lot of the complexity I'm noticing is > in how llvm/lib/LTO.cpp sets up and configures the different backends. There > seems to be an awful lot of duplicated code, and there's also a lot of > callbacks getting created/registered. I'm hoping to take a look over the next > quarter at refactoring/consolidating/simplifying some of this.
That would be awesome. I myself have trouble tracing through all of this and I've looked at this code more than most people. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/179509 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
